MVP literally stands for MOST valuable, not equally valuable. Force a tiebreaker and crown one winner, otherwise the award loses its entire prestige.
Co-MVPs feel like dodging the hard call. The whole point is comparing impact under pressure, and if you split it, you’re basically admitting the criteria failed.
MVP is about impact, not a crown. Great work is a team effort, and co-MVPs acknowledge contributions and push everyone to aim higher.
Co-MVPs honor true parity of contribution; forcing a single winner invites bias and undermines teamwork. Merit isn't a monopoly.
Real MVP stands for the one who shines brightest. Sharing the crown waters down the prestige; use clear tiebreakers to crown a single winner.
