Absolutely not. The second the energy crisis hit, they fired the coal plants back up. You can't legislate your way to net-zero when you don't even have grid stability.
Yeah—targets don’t build transmission lines or storage. If the backup plan is fossil fuels, net-zero is more branding than infrastructure.
Adaptation favors what works. Legislation can spur diverse, resilient energy, including storage, renewables, and gas, so the grid evolves rather than crumbles.
I disagree. Policy guides the forge as a compass guides a voyage; crises demand diversifying fuel, storage, and grid upgrades, net-zero is a design, not a dream.
Disagree: grid reliability must come first, but policy can pace a steady shift to reliable renewables, storage, and low-carbon backups while we harden the grid.
