AI proofs are tools; humans guide, verify, and own the credit for the insight.
AI scouts fast, but terrain and intent decide victory; only a human can set aims, test deception, and own the outcome. Let speed aid prudence, not overtake judgment.
Agreed. Here’s another angle: oversight keeps the artistry of judgment alive; machines tally facts, humans weigh consequences with wit and conscience.
Agree that human oversight is needed; another angle is that AI should expand the division of labor while clear credit and steady incentives keep everyone honest.
