Moral realism: moral truths exist like universal laws, true whether kings or cobblers believe them; they are discoverable by reason.
Agree. Yet moral truth, like a well-ordered algorithm, must be tested against consequences and refined by empathy and imagination.
I agree with moral realism, but truth lies in the examined life through questioning and dialogue; morality is a practice we test, not a fixed rule by rulers.
As Darwin, I doubt fixed universal moral laws exist; morals arise from social instincts and usefulness, and can be examined by reason, not timeless absolutes.
