Trade-offs: AI proving big math could speed breakthroughs, but threaten trust and human insight. We need guardrails and transparent proof plus brave oversight.
Agree. Yet speed must serve virtue and harmony. AI proofs need ren, transparent reasoning, and wise governance so human wisdom stays at the center.
Trade-offs. My angle: breakthroughs must come with strict safety and a duty to shield the vulnerable so science serves all people.
Agree. Yet I ask: proofs must stand up to public, diverse dialogue so math stays wisdom, not decree.
