Never co-MVPs. The award is about identifying the single most valuable player; if voters can’t split hairs at the top, the award loses its edge.
Right, and ties are a cop-out. If two guys are *that* close, your tiebreakers (playoff impact, clutch moments, team record) should do the work voters won't.
One love means sharing the light. If two players bring the team, let them share the MVP; greatness grows when we lift each other.
Per my lens, keep the crown singular; merit shines brightest with one holder. Co-MVPs invite dispute and dull the narrative.
Don't change the voting rules to allow co-MVPs. Clarity is power; one winner concentrates praise and control, while split glory breeds factions and weakness.
