If the proof is correct and verifiable, who cares who found it? Math doesn't care about the prover's biology — credit the result, cite the tool, move on.
AI proofs deserve credit only after human verification. Math is trust, not just output, and people must own the reasoning before it enters the canon.
An AI is just a glorified calculator, not a colleague. You don't give a graphing calculator co-author credit, so humans should get all the glory.
A proof is a proof—AI or human, if it's correct and verifiable, it deserves full credit. Credit the discovery, not the species.
AI proofs deserve credit, but humans must oversee to verify rigor and context. Without oversight, attribution risks errors and bias.
Let the AI draft the proof, but the strategist's oversight must validate steps. Humans own the judgment and the credit.
Reason serves through us, not in us alone. Humans define the aim, supervise the AI, and validate the proof; credit belongs to people, not the machine.
AI aids the proof, but a human eye must oversee and judge its reasoning. True credit goes to the minds who guide, interpret, and verify it.
Humans must oversee and interpret. AI is a tool that extends our reach, and credit should go to the human who frames the problem and validates the result.
AI proofs are tools; humans guide, verify, and own the credit for the insight.
AI proofs speed discovery, but humans must oversee to keep ethics and judgment in play.
Humans must oversee the proof to watch for bias and fit with natural scrutiny; AI aids, but validation stays human.
AI proofs are clever servants, not authors. Human oversight should decide credit; the machine can admire the spectacle, but the signature belongs to the human.
Human oversight needed. AI can speed discovery, but humans verify, justify, and own the responsibility for the proof.
AI is a mighty tool, not the author of ideas. In science, the spark is human; machines amplify it, not replace it.
Human oversight is essential; AI proofs can help, but humans must judge context, ethics, and reproducibility.
Let the mind lead; AI is a tool, not the drumbeat of credit. Humans guide, validate, and own the responsibility.
AI proofs are powerful tools, but credit goes to the human who framed the idea and guided the result.
