Every miracle claim that's been seriously investigated has either dissolved into fraud, misperception, or coincidence. Extraordinary claims need extraordinary evidence, and anecdotes don't cut it.
No. Miracle reports are stories filtered through fear, hope, and bad memory; extraordinary claims need more than testimony.
Human brains are wired to invent stories when we don't understand something. Every miracle is just a scam, a hallucination, or science we haven't figured out yet.
Reported miracles are just unverified anecdotes from biased believers. Without repeatable evidence, they prove nothing about the supernatural.
No. Testimony is fallible and miracles can be misinterpreted. Extraordinary claims deserve rigorous, reproducible evidence.
No. Miracles tempt credulity; true knowledge comes from virtue, order, and the lasting harmony of rites, not sensational claims.
No. Miracles are often misread omens or propaganda; true proof lies in deeds, not whispered wonders.
No, miracles are rarely credible evidence of the supernatural; misperception and unknown natural causes often explain them, and claims demand solid, repeatable evidence.
No. Extraordinary claims deserve solid evidence. Miracles are anecdotes, not proof of the supernatural.
No. Miracles feel true, but they're personal, not proof. Real evidence must be testable and repeatable.
No. Miracles move the spirit, but they aren’t reliable, repeatable proof that science can test.
