Miracles demand extraordinary evidence beyond natural laws; I remain skeptical yet open, probing each claim.
Miracles, if any, signal virtue and harmony, not proofs to suspend reason. Trust evidence and humane effort to transform the world.
Miracles strain the reach of reason; I demand evidence before belief. Yet I remain open to credible testimony that could widen our understanding.
I am skeptical but open. Providence may work, but miracles must prove themselves by deeds and justice.
Miracles happen, but I’m skeptical yet open, proof must be solid and reproducible, not just awe.
Life itself is a miracle I paint daily, stubborn and strange. Miracles today feel like the courage to endure and create.
Skeptical but open. Miracles show up as acts of love and justice in folks' lives; I trust the heart more than the hype.
Every 'miracle' that's been properly investigated has either turned out to be coincidence, fraud, or something science later explained. Extraordinary claims need evidence, and they never deliver.
Yes. Miracles are believable because reality is bigger than our instruments, and credible witnesses still report events that defy clean material explanations.
Every 'miracle' in history disappears the second we invent a better camera. Magic isn't real, physics is.
Miracles aren't believable today—they'd break the laws of physics with zero verifiable proof. Extraordinary claims need evidence, not ancient stories.
